Skip to content

User registration pages suck

Summary: you must relentlessly streamline the process by which a user joins your site and avoid even this process as long as possible.

In marketing lingo, it’s called your ‘conversion rate.’ This is the percentage of users who you successfully convince to take some action. On the web, this usually means getting someone to

  1. Click your ads.
  2. Create an account, or
  3. Buy your product.

Today I’d like to focus specifically on the second goal. This is a topic that has not been getting enough coverage. I see the same mistakes being made on hundreds of sites, and they have significant impact on the user experience.

Let’s start with an example.

Just this morning I read a blog entry on TechRepublic that I enjoyed. I was so impressed I decided to click the ‘thumbs up’ button to cast a positive vote for the entry.

Oops. “Access to this feature requires a free TechRepublic membership! Not a member? Click here to join now.”

Bad already. I’ve tried to interact with this site in the tiniest way, and it is already committing the cardinal sin in sales and flirting: trying to close too quickly.

Slow down guys. I’m not ready to make an account yet. I just want to get to know you a little bit.

This is where I usually give up on a site. I did want to test out a feature or two, but I’m not invested enough to take the time to hand over my information and create yet another account.

However, for the sake of science, this time I pressed on. Here’s TechRepublic’s registration page:

TR Registration

Wow! FOURTEEN required fields PLUS two “please spam me” check-boxes that are helpfully selected by default. This image is 860 pixels tall and you still can’t even see the submit button yet.

Why oh why make this so hard? Attention spans on the web are notoriously short, yet this site insists that ‘company size’ be a required field. I disagree. TechRepublic does not need to know my company size for me to vote up that blog post, they want that information so they can sell it to their partners.

I feel dirty now. Let’s take a cleansing look at a good registration page:

Reddit Reg

Ahhhh, much better. Four required fields, and one is just a captcha to make it hard for bots to create a billion accounts. There’s a field for an email address, but it’s optional! These are requests I’m willing to fulfill.

Let’s wrap up with some straightforward advice:

  1. Think of forcing your users to register as a last resort. Deliver as many features as possible without registration.
  2. Do not withhold features from unregistered users to convince them to register. (Under certain business models, this may be unavoidable.)
  3. When users do register, streamline the process as much as possible. One page maximum!
  4. Keep required fields to a minimum. If you’d like more detailed information, allow users to enter it through a different page later on (optionally!)
  5. Consider eliminating password complexity requirements. If you’re not holding sensitive data for them, let your users use any old password they prefer.

Happy New Year everyone.

Edit: yes, my comment boxes have name/website/email fields. All these fields are optional.

77 Comments

  1. Anonymous wrote:

    Are ‘Name’, ‘Email’, and ‘Website’ info really required for me to leave a comment???

    No comment!

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 8:43 am | Permalink
  2. Anonymous wrote:

    Couldn’t agree more

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 9:13 am | Permalink
  3. Julius wrote:

    How can you track votes, if it is not backed up by accounts? Just cookies probably won’t do..

    Agree on the rest btw

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 9:22 am | Permalink
  4. flup wrote:

    interesting. I agree entirely.

    It’s about time someone mentioned this – hopefully the sites will pick it up.

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 9:31 am | Permalink
  5. Nice that you... wrote:

    …practice what you preach.

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 9:32 am | Permalink
  6. Anonymous wrote:

    No – Name, Email, and Website are all optional.

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 9:44 am | Permalink
  7. j wrote:

    worse – 2 pages of form followed by credit card info to try an unwanted product – & still get email w/o submitting

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 9:47 am | Permalink
  8. Randomb0y wrote:

    FYI, reddit also requires registration before you can give the thumbs up on content.

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 9:53 am | Permalink
  9. Anonymous wrote:

    So I don’t have to register to leave a comment?

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 10:00 am | Permalink
  10. I must agree with you. When I go to a site that has all of these registration rules I’m immediately annoyed and usually leave. They really aren’t thinking things through very well. All of those extra fields should be included in the profile or something if you want to fill them in later.

    Reddit’s registration is extremely simple which is a big reason it’s now my favorite bookmarking site.

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 10:00 am | Permalink
  11. BobSaget wrote:

    In order for you to get my comment you’ll need to fill out this small registration form…..

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 10:25 am | Permalink
  12. Andrew Stone wrote:

    Couldn’t agree with you more!

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 10:34 am | Permalink
  13. DavidM wrote:

    I particularly hate when I have to register for a bulletin board on a site to *Search* said forum!

    I am probably at the site for some problem I am having and I have to create an account to search??

    Almost indescribably stupid policy, imo.

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 10:55 am | Permalink
  14. MHotel wrote:

    This registration process is largely a holdover from magazine subscription submission. Even “free” trade magazines required the same info TechRepublic requires so they can sell it to advertisers, and it was a simple process to get the information you wanted (the magazine) by giving them the information they wanted (the numbers for advertisers), even if it was false (yes, I work for a medical supply company and make $400k-$500k a year if it will get me your neat pharmacology trade magazine and associated weird catalogs for free).

    Now, of course, this is bad/dumb to us on short attention span web, but it is important to recognize that the way a lot of people make money, be it in print or electronic media, is in the selling of information to advertisers. That’s why TechRepublic wants all that info, because as awful as it is that they may lose your ‘sale’ as you put it, it probably seems worse to them that a user is able to interact with the site without them having that sales information.

    It is one of the many holdovers of the publishing industry that people never really liked but recognized as necessary, but will eventually go away as more companies get wise to responding to what users need instead of only focusing on what the company wants.

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 11:28 am | Permalink
  15. Anonymous wrote:

    you are correct!

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 11:38 am | Permalink
  16. Anonymous wrote:

    wish every site registration was simple as that

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 11:53 am | Permalink
  17. tikiloungelizard wrote:

    I just use (free) Roboform to fill all of the forms, and I use it to enter contests as well. I use a throwaway mailexpire.com email address that is set to expire after a few weeks (or less). The other option might be to try the right-click use of the firefox “bugmenot” (bugmenot.com) plugin.

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 11:55 am | Permalink
  18. Anonymous wrote:

    So True

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 12:06 pm | Permalink
  19. Scott wrote:

    There’s no way in Hell I’d fill out that TechRepublic form. Interestingly, ZIP code is not required but phone number and information about company size is?!

    I agree, if you HAVE to get registrants make the form as simple as possible. You can always encourage the members to fill out additional profile data later on as they become more involved and invested with the website.

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 12:41 pm | Permalink
  20. Anonymous wrote:

    >I particularly hate when I have to register for a bulletin board on a site to *Search* said forum!

    That really sucks IMO. In those cases I usually see if Google has the forums indexed with the “site:” keyword.

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 12:42 pm | Permalink
  21. Eliot wrote:

    I like Tumblr’s even better. Email address, password. Go.

    Flickr’s used to be amazing. But then Yahoo! happened[1].

    [1] http://37signals.com/svn/archives2/flickr_signup_from_human_to_droid_in_a_yahoo_moment.php

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 12:51 pm | Permalink
  22. Name wrote:

    Comments

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 12:55 pm | Permalink
  23. JimBob wrote:

    I can understand why web sites are constructed so as to cater only to those who are committed to being part of their community. Otherwise, you get a million people cluttering up your site with comments, advice, etc.
    Obviously, if you’re the web site for the International Brotherhood of Ball-Bearing Manufacturers, this is more true than if you’re a political commentary site. There is a spectrum along which different webmasters with different goals put up low-to-high barriers, depending.

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 1:18 pm | Permalink
  24. Anonymous wrote:

    I agree completely. Reddit has the best type.

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 1:48 pm | Permalink
  25. she wrote:

    “one is just a captcha to make it hard for bots to create a billion accounts.”

    I can understand the goal, but often i just wasted times with captcha which did not recognize what _I_ recognized.

    They may make life harder for bots, but they also make life harder for legimite users

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 1:53 pm | Permalink
  26. Jeff wrote:

    I remember completing the same registration page at TechRepublic, and yes, it’s one of the worst around…I even recall receiving DAILY spam from them, apparently I failed to uncheck the defaulted boxes, but why would I do that?

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 2:03 pm | Permalink
  27. Anonymous wrote:

    Some of the best advice I’ve seen in a LONG time. Want to see user-registration nightmare? Try signing up for Windows Live. It has like 15 PAGES of information that you need to fill out – just so you can play a freakin game that you already bought.

    Unbelievable.

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 2:13 pm | Permalink
  28. Crystal wrote:

    Lately I’ve been registering for tons of new sites and it’s a painful, painful process. Time to tone it down, companies!

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 2:23 pm | Permalink
  29. Shawn wrote:

    Nice article. I hate keeping track of all the accounts I have, I have lost track on at least half of the ones over the course of my lifetime.

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 2:53 pm | Permalink
  30. Jeff Biggs wrote:

    If you’re going to have an account there’s something you’re protecting. There’s no way in hell I could support bad passwords. I think 8 chars with a number is complex enough for most sites without being bad and I doubt it will hurt your conversion rate any.

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 3:00 pm | Permalink
  31. David wrote:

    I scanned this page and thought it was asking me to sign up, so was ready to click away. Glad I didn’t. Great blog

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 3:09 pm | Permalink
  32. Anonymous wrote:

    3 just kidding. thanks for the read.

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 3:31 pm | Permalink
  33. Anonymous wrote:

    Optional fields are great, as you said, but users need to *know* about them. Please put “(optional)” after all optional fields in your comment submission.

    Ed note: How about I just don’t put “required” instead? :)

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 3:34 pm | Permalink
  34. Matt wrote:

    To go to a site for information and giving information as a price is a ridiculous egotistical presumption that precipitates my backing away from entering that site. It no longer exists for me for all the rest of my life. I may miss out on something but I will never know what it was and do not care. Example New York Times, are they the only fish in the ocean?….NO! And that is true for all those other sites too.

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 3:51 pm | Permalink
  35. Rick wrote:

    Some additional advice: allow users to continue what they were doing before they registered.

    Log them in immediately after registering and redirect them to where they came from. Even if you require confirmation via e-mail to make the account permanent, just let them continue without for that one session.

    Instead of having to jump through the additional hoops of reading the confirmation mail, confirming the registration, logging in through the ‘front door’ and then having to find their own way back to what they wanted to do in the first place.

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 4:06 pm | Permalink
  36. optional wrote:

    It should really say these fields are optional. Some sites don’t mention it, and then give you a “this field is required” error message. Maybe just note it above after “please fill out the form below.”

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 4:17 pm | Permalink
  37. Anonymous wrote:

    Techrepublic has a lot of good FREE technical information, articles, etc. If you want to access the info, fill out the form. It’s that simple. I’m sure the folks at Techrepublic don’t create and aggregate this info. for their health. Many similar sites charge for access to information.

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 4:26 pm | Permalink
  38. kintamanate wrote:

    You know what would have been ironic?

    If we were required to register to leave a comment on this page…jej

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 4:33 pm | Permalink
  39. Anonymous wrote:

    There needs to be a revolt! I’ve registered to many sites but I don’t frequent them enough to remember my credentials so basically I’m back to being the same user I was before on those sites and since thats more work, why bother?

    Engadget has the right idea, you can up or down vote comments without having to register. I tend to read more articles there than I do at other similar sites. For example here is the latest post from their site, I just grabbed the first one I saw to use as an example:
    http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/02/zeetoos-zeemote-the-wiimote-for-your-cellphone/

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 5:35 pm | Permalink
  40. JC wrote:

    Great advice if you are running a site similar to Reddit.

    Would be nice to have information on how much data is acceptable to collect on an e-commerce site, or a community where exclusiveness is an appealing trait.

    On sites requiring more data, better all on one form, or step by step “wizard” style sign up?

    Great start, but this topic begs many more questions than your article answered. Would love to see a follow up.

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 5:54 pm | Permalink
  41. Padreo wrote:

    The site http://clickodometer.com has one of the quickest and easiest I’ve used too.

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 5:59 pm | Permalink
  42. Okay while reddit is better I don’t know if it’s ideal.

    if your seriously looking to get rid of fields there is no reason to have both a username and email. perhaps a username would be nice for display purposes but they can login with the email. I know email is optional on their page but you want the page to also look as small as possible.

    also two password fields are standard but you can scale that down to one. if you have a good forgot password system set up it’s better to let a couple people miss type a password then add an extra field.

    their CAPTCHA is also too dark. I know there are not too many CAPTACHA libraries with a focus on design but one with a white back ground would not feel so heavy on the page and make the form feel smaller.

    Though I have not tested the difference between CAPTCHAs and an email confirm system I personally feel an email confirmation email would make registrations go up while keeping out the bots as well.

    I’ve always like the LibraryThing registration page. only three fields.

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 6:09 pm | Permalink
  43. Anonymous wrote:

    perhaps if openid or whatever it’s called were to take ground you’d only have to go through such a painful process only once.

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 7:12 pm | Permalink
  44. Brian wrote:

    Well said. I have never found a registration page quite as idiotic as that one, but I have very often abandoned a site at the first “you must register to do this” warning.

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 7:25 pm | Permalink
  45. jamma wrote:

    I just leave an email address I save for spam on sites like the ones you mention. The required forms I fill out with bogus information. I don’t feel like such a cog in marketing’s wheel that way.

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 7:44 pm | Permalink
  46. Anonymous wrote:

    1) I suspect most people put FAKE info in registration pages.

    2) I’ve lost track of half the passwords I ever created, because there have been so many. No, I don’t like keeping them in my browser’s password file.

    3) There is more stuff on the web that interests me, than what I have time to look at. If I meet a registration form on your site, I leave.

    4) In the rare event I do decide to register, don’t punish me for mis-typing a single field by resetting the *entire* form and making me start over.

    5) If you have a legitimate (community building) interest in collecting personal info, do it a little bit at a time over several visits.

    Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 8:00 pm | Permalink
  47. Anonymous wrote:

    Hooray for sanity!

    Thursday, January 3, 2008 at 12:21 am | Permalink
  48. Elvis wrote:

    What really frustrates me is when google returns a blurb and link to a page, then you get there and you must create an account to see anything … then you go back, look at the cached page, only to find (paraphrased) “these search terms djsojfos fsdopsp whatever appeared on links to the page below”…

    either I have really poor color perception or more than half of the
    CAPTCHAs are unreadable…

    Thursday, January 3, 2008 at 12:27 am | Permalink
  49. Yaseen Shaik wrote:

    Thnks, I agree with you.

    Thursday, January 3, 2008 at 12:31 am | Permalink
  50. Anonymous wrote:

    When some page requires registration, don’t link to a registration page. Give a 302 response instead to redirect the user to the registration page instead.
    When a user has logged in, going back in history and selecting links won’t take the user to the login page that way. The user doesn’t understand it if (s)he logs in and later reads that something requires prior registration.

    Somewhat unrelated here, but when submitting your form results in a financial transaction, generate an id in advance and put it in a hidden field, then on submit, make sure the same id hasn’t already been processed. You could use a random number thats unique for at least the last n hours/days (I would). You shouldn’t reuse an existing table to do this bookkeeping.

    This way, the ‘view source’ function in browsers won’t lead to the *nasty* surprise of getting billed twice.

    Thursday, January 3, 2008 at 2:06 am | Permalink
  51. Kroum wrote:

    Reddit’s CAPTCHA is totally unusable.
    Look at the screenshot of your “good” registration page.
    Now tell what’s the CAPTCHA answer?
    RIVXLO
    RIYXLO
    RIVXLQ
    RIYXLQ
    Yes, right it’s: “your letters stink”
    By the way, Reddit, your registration page stinks too.

    Thursday, January 3, 2008 at 2:30 am | Permalink
  52. Anonymous wrote:

    If you do sign up for something, consider using the name “joe blow” or “john doe” or “jane doe” (These are good for those companies’ databases).

    How about when you wan’t to communicate with a company, and they force you into their email system with a 2-inch square box (or even a one-line box). They usually don’t reply, but it is funny when someone occasionally replies to Mr. blow at my junk email box.

    Thursday, January 3, 2008 at 3:26 am | Permalink
  53. Shannon wrote:

    I agree some captchas can be hard, but if reddits one reads as anything other than RIYXLQ your the one with the issue, not reddit

    Thursday, January 3, 2008 at 5:28 am | Permalink
  54. Anonymous wrote:

    Sikorskyfcu.org is a credit union… I am a member because I am an employee of Sikorsky.

    there are three… 3… Tres…Tatlo… pages to just login… let alone signing up. I know this is a secure website and all but even my regular bank doesn’t make it this difficult. My bank only has a one login screen.

    if you screw up your login, your account number stays on the screen for all to see.

    Thursday, January 3, 2008 at 6:41 am | Permalink
  55. Julie wrote:

    Couldn’t agree more. Thanks for articulating something that’s been bugging me for ages. I really don’t want to get cosy with sites until I’m finding that I use them regularly.

    Thursday, January 3, 2008 at 5:55 pm | Permalink
  56. Random clickthrough wrote:

    Hmm…. yes I agree – I am a Techrepublic member and thinking about quitting as they are so annoying and invasive.

    Conversely, I have only just started using Reddit and your article made me want to sign up!

    Do you feel validated now? :)

    Thursday, January 3, 2008 at 8:00 pm | Permalink
  57. David wrote:

    In some contexts making your user registration page sucks can also be a good strategy.

    In community sites who make (or break) the content ?
    Participants !

    Depending on your goals, you may wish to select them a bit.

    So this fastidious registration process can be a good way to check their implication and motivation before they can act.

    Even for a simple vote.
    Aren’t these little thumbs up or down that decide what’s on the frontpage ?

    I m affraid to imagine what the web would look like if every website has to be ruled by their average google lurker…

    Please don’t throw me wikipedia as an example, as not any site has such a noble goal and wiki structure, plus i know they had very hard time moderating, which not any community could overcome.

    Friday, January 4, 2008 at 3:50 am | Permalink
  58. marko wrote:

    OpenID is the answer.

    Friday, January 4, 2008 at 6:11 am | Permalink
  59. A non e-mouse wrote:

    I agree totally with your password idea. I HATE it when sites DEMAND I use a number in my password. I use passwords that DON’T have numbers in them by design. And when I must use a number, it just makes me forget my password. How does including a number in a password make it More secure? It doesn’t, it’s just some idiots idea of security that can be backed up by NOTHING. Good post, and I’m glad I didn’t have to register to comment!

    Friday, January 4, 2008 at 6:43 am | Permalink
  60. Anonymous wrote:

    Great article

    Friday, January 4, 2008 at 8:25 am | Permalink
  61. Ryan wrote:

    You’ve convinced me. I’ve kinda known all along that people hate making accounts, I myself hate doing it, but I required it on my site (www.linkbin.com) to cast votes.

    I see the error of my ways and I’ll be making it so people can vote without an account.

    Friday, January 4, 2008 at 9:31 am | Permalink
  62. Anonymous wrote:

    Brilliant. You’ve got it all right. I simply won’t bother registering unless a site really has something that’s worth the effort and I already know it.

    Saturday, January 5, 2008 at 1:55 am | Permalink
  63. Keith wrote:

    Very informative article, thanks!

    Saturday, January 5, 2008 at 6:50 am | Permalink
  64. Aaron Peters wrote:

    Hi Ben,

    Enjoyed reading your article.
    The Reddit reg form is good indeed.
    We are in the process of re-designing our site and will have a simpler Sign up form, with less required fields.
    Only username, password, email address, CAPTCHA and Acceptance to our T&C.

    Monday, January 14, 2008 at 4:41 am | Permalink
  65. I just found this post from the aweber forums. I couldn’t agree more. I have quickly leave websites that require me to create an account for something as simple as voting, leaving a comment or providing feedback.

    Here’s a vote for your post!

    Geoff

    Wednesday, April 9, 2008 at 6:03 am | Permalink
  66. Chuck Bartok wrote:

    Another reader from Aweber Blog. Thank you for the support of feelings for a long time.

    Spend time developing the relationship after the Prospect signs up.
    Thanks again

    Wednesday, April 9, 2008 at 7:05 am | Permalink
  67. Anonymous wrote:

    Good points. For my purposes, I keep my form simple: two fields–first name and email. I have decent conversion.

    Wednesday, April 9, 2008 at 5:37 pm | Permalink
  68. AWESOME wrote:

    You are speaking the truth, people just want to post a comment and then wait a little while and see what others have to say about it then the move on throughout the web. thanks for saying what needed to be said.

    Thursday, June 12, 2008 at 7:57 am | Permalink
  69. Great article. Thank you for posting it. I to found you from AWeber and I thank them for giving us your link.

    I am now going to read some other posts on this site and take a look around.

    I try to think of the Golden Rule when I am working on web forms. And basically it come down to this. If I give the subscriber something of “value” they will give me there email address, something I “value”. Exchange!

    Randy J Bradley

    Wednesday, March 18, 2009 at 10:59 pm | Permalink
  70. Mary wrote:

    I totally agree. Sometimes I would like to leave a comment to a good article, etc, but who has time to register at 100 different sites, creating passwords and user names, blah blah blah. It is ridiculous. So, when I see, “You have to register to leave a comment” I move on.

    Friday, April 17, 2009 at 8:15 am | Permalink
  71. Простите, что не втему, но всех прочитавших пршу зайти на молдавский блог и прочитать инормацию по голосованию за нашу независимость – это очень важно дли нас

    Wednesday, April 29, 2009 at 9:30 am | Permalink
  72. Yvonne wrote:

    I’ve got to wonder — why is a password even necessary? Why not ask just for the name and the e-mail address? Isn’t that enough for first time visitors?

    Monday, May 11, 2009 at 4:08 am | Permalink
  73. Почему это вдруг вот так то? Думаю, как нам раздвинуть данную тему.

    Tuesday, May 19, 2009 at 8:01 am | Permalink
  74. Как мухи на гавно… ейбогу… ну как мухи на гавно.. на гавно мухи… как будто.. ейбогу.

    Wednesday, May 20, 2009 at 6:27 am | Permalink
  75. I don’t think I’ve ever come across another news/blog type of site that had a had a registration form as invasive as Tech Republic’s.

    And it’s not only to vote or post a comment that Tech Republic requires registration. Perhaps _that_ could be justified on the grounds of deterring trolling, spam and just reducing the number of inevitable idiotic comments that have to be waded through when searching for signs of intelligent life.

    No. Merely trying to _view_ all comments on one page (as opposed to tediously having to view each individual comment on a separate page) triggered a ‘registration is required’ page.
    …………….
    I also agree w/ a previous post regarding the fields for posting a comment _here_; without actually stating that the name, email and website fields are optional, that will not at all be clear to many people. (and many will not bother posting because of that)

    Monday, February 15, 2010 at 1:17 am | Permalink
  76. Anonymous wrote:

    Will this comment work without providing my name, email and website?

    Saturday, March 13, 2010 at 6:12 pm | Permalink
  77. Anonymous wrote:

    I like how reddit doesn’t require an e-mailadres to register.

    Tuesday, May 4, 2010 at 2:25 am | Permalink

10 Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. purrl.net |** the web's most interesting news **| on Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 10:05 am

    The web’s most interesting stories on Wed 2nd Jan 2008

    These are the web’s most talked about URLs on Wed 2nd Jan 2008. The current winner is ..

  2. Support this story on Stirrdup on Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 12:40 pm

    User registration pages suck

    This story has been submitted to Stirrdup. Your support can help it become hot.

  3. meneame.net on Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 1:39 pm

    Cómo no debe ser una página de registro

    Pequeña lección de usabilidad (en inglés) a la hora de hacer una página de registro, que debe animar al usuario a registrarse y no a acojonarse con la petición de miles de datos. Un mal ejemplo, el de TechRepublic (techrepublic.com.com/1300-4_11-5…

  4. roScripts - Webmaster resources and websites on Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 4:15 pm

    User registration pages suck : Codeulate.

    User registration pages suck : Codeulate.

  5. fritzair.com » Whats best today 1/2/08 on Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 4:18 pm

    [...] You could go to Reddit and click on all the links about Iowa, Fox News, Ron Paul or Mrs. Clinton. (Same stuff over and over as we get closer to the Iowa decisions.) or just follow the links below: User registration pages suck (pics) [...]

  6. links for 2008-01-03 | Funny Stuff is all around on Wednesday, January 2, 2008 at 5:33 pm

    [...] User registration pages suck : Codeulate. (tags: usability registration internet design ui webdesign web) [...]

  7. links for 2008-01-04 « toonz on Friday, January 4, 2008 at 4:22 pm

    [...] User registration pages suck : Codeulate. (tags: usability ui marketing) [...]

  8. Forum One Tech Blog on Monday, January 14, 2008 at 10:35 am

    Web Developer Design Considerations

    As a web developer, my job depends greatly not only on how efficient the backend code is, but how intuitive the site is for the user. As the web moves further and further from the “monkey see” to “monkey do” mentality, web developers are needing to…

  9. [...] name of the post — “User Registration Pages Suck.” — might sound harsh, but it’s a helpful view into what your visitors may be thinking [...]

  10. [...] Once you decide that the benefit is worth a visitor’s time you must ask yourself, “What information do I absolutely need?”  If you host a health/wellness database you need to collect a bit more information than someone [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.